The compliance landscape for workplace drug testing is shifting faster than many employers realize. Between federal cannabis rescheduling discussions, proposed DOT panel expansions, and state-by-state cannabis law changes, HR teams and safety managers are facing a critical question: is our drug testing program actually ready for what’s coming?
At Universal Background Screening, our Drug Testing & Occupational Health (DTOH) team works with employers every day who are navigating these exact challenges. Understanding what these changes actually mean for your workforce, your liability, and your day-to-day operations requires more than tracking headlines.
Here’s what you need to know right now.
Federal Marijuana Rescheduling: Separating Facts from Assumptions
Cannabis rescheduling has created more confusion than clarity for many employers. In late 2025, the White House directed the DOJ and DEA to expedite rulemaking to move marijuana to Schedule III. This immediately triggered questions from employees and assumptions about what’s allowed.
Here’s what matters for your workplace:
Rescheduling marijuana to Schedule III is not the same as federal legalization. It doesn’t automatically change employment law, and it definitely doesn’t change DOT regulations. On December 19, 2025, DOT published a compliance notice making this crystal clear: until rescheduling is finalized, DOT drug testing processes remain unchanged. Safety-sensitive transportation employees will continue to be tested for marijuana.
The real risk right now? Inconsistent messaging to your workforce. Employees are hearing news about cannabis policy changes and making assumptions about what that means for your workplace rules. Supervisors who lack clear guidance create exposure for the organization.
What to do: Refresh your supervisor training now. Make sure your team can explain the difference between federal rescheduling, state legalization, and your company’s safety policies. Update employee communications to address common misconceptions before they become problems.
DOT Drug Panel Expansion: Fentanyl Testing Is Coming
On September 2, 2025, DOT issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to add fentanyl and norfentanyl to the standard DOT drug testing panel. The move directly responds to real-world safety threats impacting transportation employers.
For companies with DOT-regulated employees, this signals where federal enforcement priorities are headed. Even before the final rule takes effect, it’s worth asking: is our current program positioned to adapt?
What to do now:
Review your drug testing policy language. If it specifically references a “DOT 5-panel” test, that language may need updating when the rule is finalized. Work with your Medical Review Officer (MRO), lab partner, and third-party administrator to understand their readiness for expanded panel testing. This includes specimen collection protocols, reporting workflows, and expected turnaround times.
Equally important: prepare your HR and safety teams for the employee relations side. Fentanyl positives carry different safety implications than other substances, and how you handle these cases needs to be both legally defensible and consistently applied.
Oral Fluid Testing for DOT: Still Waiting on Lab Certification
Oral fluid testing remains one of the most asked-about topics for DOT employers, and for good reason. It offers logistical advantages, especially for companies with mobile workforces or remote job sites. But the timeline keeps getting pushed.
DOT has approved oral fluid testing in principle, but employers cannot implement it until at least two HHS-certified laboratories are operational (one for primary testing, one for split specimen testing). As of January 6, 2026, the Federal Register confirmed there are still no HHS-certified labs for oral fluid DOT testing.
What this means: Oral fluid testing for DOT purposes isn’t available yet, but it’s still coming. When HHS certifications are issued, implementation timelines will be tight.
What to do: Don’t wait for the final announcement to start planning. Update your standard operating procedures now. Train collectors on oral fluid protocols. Develop contingency plans for how you’ll transition specimen types if and when oral fluid becomes available. Companies that prepare now will have a competitive advantage when certifications go live.
FMCSA Enforcement: English Proficiency and CDL Integrity Under Scrutiny
Transportation employers are seeing noticeably increased enforcement activity in two specific areas: driver qualification files and CDL issuance integrity.
English Language Proficiency Is Now an Out-of-Service Violation
On May 20, 2025, FMCSA issued updated enforcement guidance on English language proficiency requirements under 49 CFR § 391.11(b)(2). Effective June 25, 2025, the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance (CVSA) began enforcing this as a driver out-of-service violation.
Drivers who cannot demonstrate English proficiency during roadside inspections can be placed out of service immediately. That means load delays, customer service disruptions, and potential contractual penalties.
What this means for you: English language proficiency now directly impacts roadside operations and service continuity.
What to do: Add a standardized English language proficiency verification checkpoint to your driver qualification process. This should happen at hire and be reinforced during recurrent training. Make sure your safety team has internal escalation plans ready for out-of-service events, including load recovery procedures, alternate driver dispatch protocols, and customer notification templates.
Non-Domiciled CDL Audits: Federal Pressure on State Licensing Practices
FMCSA has also launched a nationwide audit of how states issue non-domiciled CDLs. The focus is on preventing unqualified individuals from obtaining commercial licenses and creating safety risks. Recent enforcement actions in states like California and North Carolina show this is an active priority.
What this means for you: If your hiring process relies on state-issued CDLs without additional verification, you may be assuming compliance that doesn’t actually exist.
What to do: Tighten your driver qualification file practices immediately. This includes CDL verification, Motor Vehicle Record (MVR) review, and Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse checks where applicable. Don’t assume a valid CDL means a qualified driver.
State-Level Cannabis Policy: Why “One Size Fits All” Doesn’t Work Anymore
States are moving in completely different directions on cannabis policy. Some are expanding recreational access. Others are adding medical programs. A few are restricting how employers can use drug test results. For multi-state employers, this creates a patchwork compliance challenge.
States to Watch: Recreational and Medical Expansion
Several states have active cannabis legislation that could impact employer drug testing policies in 2026:
Recreational/adult-use activity:
- New Hampshire’s HB 186 passed the House 208-135 in January 2026
- Pennsylvania has active adult-use legalization bills (including SB 120) in the current session
- Florida’s adult-use proposal is under state Supreme Court review, with oral arguments scheduled for February 5
Medical program expansion:
- South Carolina’s “Compassionate Care Act” (S. 53) remains active
- Kansas is considering SB 294, which would establish a medical cannabis framework
- Idaho may see a medical marijuana initiative on the November 3, 2026, ballot
- North Carolina has filed an adult-use legalization bill (S 350), and the Governor convened a cannabis advisory council with recommendations due March 15, 2026
States Restricting THC Testing: The Shift Toward Impairment Standards
Beyond legalization, we’re seeing a clear trend toward limiting how employers can use marijuana test results. Some states are moving away from metabolite-based disqualification and toward impairment-focused standards. Others are restricting when testing can occur.
Massachusetts H.2179, for example, would prohibit pre-employment marijuana testing until after a conditional job offer is made.
What this means for you: State cannabis laws don’t eliminate your responsibility for workplace safety. They change how you prove you’re meeting that responsibility. Your policy language, job safety categorization, and documentation practices become your primary legal defense.
What to do: Stop treating your non-DOT drug testing policy as a universal document. Map your workforce by state. Identify which positions are safety-sensitive and which aren’t. Build testing protocols that align with each state’s specific requirements. This is particularly critical if you operate in states with pending legislation.
Hemp-Derived THC: A Quiet Compliance Issue Getting Louder
Even outside state marijuana legalization, hemp-derived THC products are creating workplace testing complications. Employees are consuming products labeled as “CBD” or “legal hemp,” assuming they’re safe for work, and then testing positive for THC.
Federal hemp regulations are also changing. Public Law 119-37 modifies the federal hemp definition, with implementation scheduled for November 12, 2026 (365 days after enactment). This may impact product availability and labeling practices.
What this means for you: Expect more “I only used CBD” explanations when employees test positive. Legal product availability and workplace safety standards are two different things.
What to do: Educate your workforce clearly and consistently. “Legal to buy” is not the same as “acceptable for safety-sensitive work.” Product labels are not guarantees of THC content. Your drug testing policy should spell this out explicitly.
What This Actually Means for Your Organization
If you’re an HR director, safety manager, or compliance officer reading this, here’s the bottom line:
Your drug testing program needs to do more than exist. It needs to be defensible.
That means:
- Policies that reflect current legal requirements, not outdated templates
- Training that equips supervisors to handle real-world scenarios and employee questions
- Documentation practices that can withstand regulatory audits and legal challenges
- Vendor partnerships that provide compliance expertise, not just lab results
The employers who will navigate 2026 successfully aren’t the ones waiting for final rules to be published. They’re the ones building flexible programs now that can adapt as regulations evolve.
Why Work with UBS DTOH
Universal Background Screening’s Drug Testing & Occupational Health team brings in-house certified professionals, DOT program expertise, and nationwide collection capabilities to help employers build defensible testing programs.
We help you understand what regulatory changes mean for your specific workforce, develop compliant policies that match your operational reality, and implement testing protocols that hold up under scrutiny.
Our approach includes:
- Policy review and development aligned with federal and state-specific requirements
- DOT compliance support, including Part 40 program administration
- Nationwide specimen collection network with SAMHSA-certified lab partnerships
- Electronic ordering, real-time reporting, and program analytics
- Ongoing regulatory monitoring and proactive compliance guidance
The Path Forward
Workplace drug testing in 2026 will be shaped by three forces: evolving cannabis laws, emerging drug threats like fentanyl, and higher enforcement expectations in transportation. The employers who succeed will be the ones who treat compliance as a strategic priority, not an administrative task.
If your drug testing program hasn’t been reviewed in the past 12 months, now is the time. If your supervisors can’t clearly explain your cannabis policy to employees, that’s a gap that needs closing. If you’re operating in multiple states with a single testing policy, you may have more exposure than you realize.
Ready to audit your program? Contact Universal Background Screening to review your current policies, assess audit readiness, and develop a state-by-state compliance strategy that actually works for your business.
